A REVIEW OF THE SUPPORT PROVIDED BY THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT GROUP FOR DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATIONS
ABSTRACT
Till recently, most development organisations tended to focus on client management, with programme management being given less importance. Of late due to compulsions like decreasing funds for welfare work, increasing need for accountability, the need to reduce costs and improve effectiveness of interventions, improving sustainability and so on, programme management is being given equal importance. Over the last one and a half years, the Technical Support Group has worked with development organisations, particularly those involved in non-institutional forms of rehabilitation in different countries, through assignments to improve their performance. The group carries out information dissemination through the production of the 'Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal', 'Friday Meeting Transactions', other occasional publications, and through the conduct of a 'Friday Meeting' on different aspects of rehabilitation. Other assignments of the group involve organisational diagnosis and development, and training related to planning and establishment of efficient administrative systems. This paper discusses the critical factors that lead to successful outcomes in these assignments.
INTRODUCTION
'Management' in relation to development organisations is commonly understood to have two meanings. The first refers to management of clients by the organisation in order to achieve its goals, for example, rehabilitation interventions like physiotherapy to improve mobility in disabled people. The second meaning of the term refers to the programme management that knits together the different components of the organisation and makes it function as a single unit. Till recently, the emphasis in development organisations had been on client management, with programme management being seen as less important. In recent years, due to compulsions like decreasing funds for welfare work, increasing need for accountability, the need to reduce costs and improve effectiveness of interventions, improving sustainability and so on, programme management is being given equal emphasis (1).
Over the last one and a half years, the Technical Support Group has worked with development organisations, particularly those involved in non-institutional forms of rehabilitation in different countries, through assignments to improve their performance. The Technical Support Group is a loose-knit group without a formal organisational structure. Entry and exit of people in this group is assignment specific and not time specific, that is, persons with different types of skills come in as and when necessary for a specific responsibility assigned to them by the co-ordinator of the group, and leave when they complete the assignment. The people associated with this Group in the last one and a half years have included managers from NGOs, doctors, housewives, human resource development managers from industry, a marketing manager from industry, a chartered accountant, a student from a business management school and two international rehabilitation consultants. The underlying principle behind all assignments in this group is to produce the best possible outcomes, in the most cost effective manner, in consultation with the client organisations.
The 'vision' of the Technical Support Group is the creation of high level of performance in development organisations, particularly those involved in non-institutional forms of rehabilitation, and its mission is to improve performance in development organisations through access to contemporary knowledge, and training. In order to fulfil its mission, the group carries out certain activities such as the dissemination of information through the production and circulation of the 'Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal', 'Friday Meeting Transactions', other occasional publications, and through the conduct of a 'Friday Meeting' on different aspects of disability and rehabilitation. The other objectives of the group are to improve the performance of development organisations through organisational diagnosis and development assignments, and through providing training related to planning and establishment of efficient administrative systems.
ACTIVITIES
1. Information dissemination - Description of activities
The Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal produced by the Technical Support Group, is a bi-annual Journal, meant for private circulation among researchers, planners, administrators, professionals, donor organisations and implementing agencies involved in disability and rehabilitation. This is an academic journal that publishes articles related to policy development, concept clarification, development of methodology in the areas of service delivery, training of personnel, programme evaluation, and development of technology related to rehabilitation. Articles are published after peer reviews by international reviewers, under four different sections, namely, Developmental articles, Original articles, Brief Reports, and Letters to Editor. About 2000 copies of the Journal are mailed free of cost to over 73 countries all over the world. The Journal and its associate publications are available online on the Internet at http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/prdl/othr/apdrj/apdrj.html
Friday Meeting Transactions is an associate publication of the Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. This bi-annual newsletter is for private circulation and is mailed free of cost on request. It generates its articles from the summary reports of the transactions at the Friday Meetings held on the last Friday of every odd month in Bangalore, India, along with articles on applied aspects of rehabilitation from other authors. It is a newsletter, which publishes training materials that are useful for trainers, practitioners and policy makers. It is available on the Internet at the same website as the Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal.
Friday Meetings are held on the last Friday of every odd month, such as January, March, May and so on in Bangalore, India. These meetings are a get together of people who are interested in the field of non-institutional rehabilitation, to discuss and debate themes related to application of different methods and development of skills in this field. Those who are interested in the field attend without an invitation, and usually between 60 to 70 attend the meeting. The participants attend from different groups such as international donors, development organisations, government officials, business houses involved in promoting development, media, rehabilitation practitioners, researchers, academicians and disabled people. It is always conducted at the same venue on the last Friday of odd months, between 2 pm and 5 pm. The meeting starts with a 45 minute presentation on a theme, followed by a discussion between the participants about the theme. The opinions thus generated can be of great use to people who are decision makers, researchers and interventionists. Sometimes these meetings can also be useful for people to present their innovative programmes and get feedback about their viability before they are started. The participation at the Friday Meetings has been gradually increasing over the last one year. It is expected that it will also promote greater application of the knowledge gained during these interactive meetings, in the work of the participants.
Information dissemination - Discussion
The first effort at information dissemination started with a newsletter, which had a mixture of academic papers, information on applied knowledge, other information related to rehabilitation such as new publications, new techniques, new appliances, and details about projects involved in rehabilitation and CBR programmes. This newsletter was not targeted at any specific readership groups in the initial stages, and was primarily used for advocacy in CBR. After collecting feedback from readers a few times, it was found that there were three kinds of readers in this field who wanted different kinds of information. The first group consisted of academics and related others who are primarily concerned with establishing new findings and their validity. The second group consisted of implementers of projects and trainers who wanted to acquire knowledge regarding the applied aspects of the subject, presented in a simple form. These two groups, who constituted a substantial proportion of the readership, did not feel comfortable with the overlap of subjects in the periodical, as was originally presented. A third group of readers consisted of planners and policy makers, who wanted part of both areas. In response to this feedback, the periodical was then split into two: a journal dealing with primarily new information, either proving or disproving its validity, and published after peer review; and a newsletter dealing with applied aspects, presented in a format that was simple and useful for trainers and implementers, and published without peer review.
A third activity, the 'Friday Meetings', which was already going on independently, was integrated as a component of this information dissemination process. The 'Friday Meetings' are a brainstorming effort by a group of local people from diverse backgrounds who are interested in CBR. These debates on themes related to CBR once in two months, synthesise the views from diverse fields and identify what is applicable to the work in the field. They also generate an enormous amount of data on the applicability of various concepts, which in turn is presented through the 'Friday Meeting Transactions'. Thus the information dissemination effort not only disseminates the available information, but also generates new information through the various articles and through the debates at the 'Friday Meeting' sessions.
These efforts have helped to improve performance of all levels of CBR practitioners by updating their knowledge through the journal and the newsletter that are mailed free of cost and through the online version on the web site. They are also utilised as training materials in some countries to increase the knowledge base, efficiency and enthusiasm of the participants in the CBR field.
2. Organisational diagnosis and development assignments : description
These assignments have been undertaken in countries in South Asia, South East Asia and Africa. The objectives, the process followed, the outcomes and the follow up are summarised below.
Assignment 'A'
Project Description | Organisation working for blind people, through programmes of mobility training, basic rehabilitation training, technical training and rural CBR projects |
Objectives |
|
Process | The process was carried out using observation of activities, analysis of records, focus group discussion and interviews with governing board, staff, trainees, families, and employers of trainedpersons, and SWOT analysis. |
Outcomes |
|
Follow up |
|
Remarks | Initially, it seemed that a process of change had been initiated. However, the project has been a failure subsequently due to difficulties in overcoming the resistance to change on the part of the organisation. Traditionally, many NGOs consider counting their `activities' as a count of achievements rather than the count of `outcomes' of those activities. Similarly, creativity and adapting to change are difficult for these organisations. This project also counted the number of training programmes carried out as a count of achievement, rather than their achievement in gaining employment for their trainees, or the improved earning status of the trainees as a result of the training. This assignment was a failure because the resistance to change could not be overcome. It is suggested that `creativity' and positive attitude for `change' need to be created in the organisation prior to the actual interventions for change. This step was not anticipated in advance in this programme due to the lack of adequate understanding of the organisational dynamics before undertaking the assignment. |
Assignment 'B'
Project Description | Organisation providing residential vocational training for adult hearing impaired women |
Objectives |
|
Process | Carried out using focus group discussion with board, management and trainees, and SWOT analysis, with all these groups. |
Outcomes |
|
Follow up |
|
Remarks | The project was functioning with a set of randomly selected objectives, without a clear vision and mission. The organisational policy was clarified and disseminated to all levels of functionaries and an activity plan was developed based on the policies, after prioritising the needs for the next two years. In the process of prioritising, some activities were discontinued while others were enhanced and expanded to produce maximum effectiveness. Targets were set for all activities. The project developed a plan to raise funds locally instead of being entirely dependent on charity funds, and began to network with others to learn about contemporary methods. With improved clarity about their goals and activities, they were able to function better than earlier. The level of satisfaction expressed by the donor and the project was high in this assignment. The willingness to accept new ideas on the part of the project was a major contributory factor to its success. This was achieved by prior familiarisation of the evaluators' methods by the project personnel, the participatory methods used to improve clarity of goals, recognising the needs of the project as well as of the donor and finding a mutually agreeable solution to the needs. |
Assignment 'C'
Project Description | National level organisation established to promote employment opportunities for disabled people, dealing with advocacy. |
Objectives |
|
Process | A workshop was conducted, sponsored by an industry, with representation from industry, NGOs, disabled persons, and the trustees of the organisation, to jointly develop the different aspects of the policy document. |
Outcomes | A policy document was developed, printed and disseminated to all stakeholders who were involved with the organisation. The document was also used for advocacy on the theme of employment of disabled people. |
Follow up |
|
Remarks | In this assignment, the active participation of all the stakeholders in the workshop was a significant factor leading to success. Preparing the participants of the workshop in advance by informing them about the goal of the workshop, the tentative goals of the organisation as initially visualised by a few initiators, distributing available background information about the theme to the participants, motivating the participants through repeated communications about the need for active contribution and participation in the brainstorming, helped in achieving clarity during the workshop. The workshop was thus highly participatory and the resulting policy document was very useful for the organisation to progress further. |
Assignment 'D'
Project Description | Organisation providing technical support to others, in the area of improving mobility of disabled people. |
Objectives | To assess the management systems followed at different levels of the organisation, the efficiency of different activities, and the level of impact of organisation's activities on disabled people |
Process | Performance audit was carried out at the 3 levels in a participatory manner using focus group discussions and interviews with governing board, executives, partners, associates, and disabled people, and SWOT analysis. |
Outcomes |
|
Follow up |
|
Remarks | The project had been carrying out its activities randomly earlier, without having a clear idea of the composite picture of the organisation. The evaluation process helped the project personnel to understand its nature as a composite organisation, with different activities linked together in an interrelated manner to form the whole. This understanding helped to increase motivation and efficiency within the organisation, leading in turn to better performance, better credibility and consequently, better fund raising capability. |
Assignment 'E'
Project Description | Organisation providing special education services for hearing impaired children. |
Objectives |
|
Process | Focus group discussions were held with the board, executives and parent groups. |
Outcomes |
|
Follow up |
|
Remarks | This project had been over-dependent on a single source of funds, without looking at the possibility of securing more stable and multiple sources of funds. Expansion plans were being made impulsively and randomly, without systematic planning and feasibility studies. The evaluation helped the stakeholders to understand the need for becoming less dependent on a single source of funds and to become self sufficient financially, with the active involvement of all of them. They also learned the importance of systematic planning. Their willingness to accept new ideas, the active participation of the different stakeholder groups and their readiness to assume the responsibilities arising from the action plan without external support, contributed to success in this assignment. This project also had an exceptional leader with high creativity and an open attitude to imbibe change. |
Assignment 'F'
Project Description | Organisation carrying out special education interventions and a CBR programme for people with disabilities in rural areas. |
Objectives |
|
Process | Two evaluators were part of this study. Different activities were observed, project records were checked, focus group discussions and interviews were conducted with the board, management, staff, clients and parents, and a SWOT analysis was conducted. Each of the elements was rated independently by the 2 evaluators using a previously prepared evaluation protocol with outcome indicators, quantitative and qualitative measures. |
Outcomes |
|
Follow up |
|
Remarks | In this assignment, the use of 2 evaluators, one with expertise in management systems and the other with expertise in client interventions, contributed to a more comprehensive review process. The level of satisfaction in the donor and the project was high, and the report was stated to have fulfilled the objectives of the donor to a great extent, in identifying the areas that needed further attention to improve the outcome of interventions. |
Assignment 'G'
Project Description | Organisation providing medical, educational and vocational rehabilitation services for children with mental handicap, cerebral palsy and multiple disabilities , in an urban centre and in 3 rural centres. |
Objectives |
Stage 1 objectives:
|
Process | Different activities were observed in the urban and rural centres, and focus group discussions and interviews were conducted with the board, staff, associates, clients and families in some of the rural areas, in order to complete the tasks required to fulfil the objectives. |
Outcomes |
|
Follow up |
|
Remarks | This project had a strong institutional and professional base, where the emphasis was on service provision. Concepts of community participation were new to the organisation. The time spent to develop the rapport with the organisation, the provision of background materials related to community participation and participatory planning prior to undertaking the visit, the detailed discussions with the board and staff on issues related to community participation, helped to change the attitude of the project towards the need for community participation in its proposed CBR programme. However, due to unforeseen circumstances, the schedule of activities to complete the needs and resource assessment and to conduct the workshop, was disrupted, leading to a break between the initial and the latter stages, which may lessen enthusiasm of the participants. |
Assignment 'H'
Project Description | Organisation involved in community development, focusing on natural resources management, women's groups for savings and credit, health and education interventions. |
Objectives |
|
Process | Focus group discussions were held with the board and staff of the organisation, based on a previously drawn up protocol to assess different areas. |
Outcomes | The organisation was identified as a suitable one to carry out the CBR programme in the region, after assessing their familiarity with community development methods similar to CBR, capability of planning for CBR, need for CBR in the area of operation, resources available for CBR, current familiarity with CBR concepts, accountability, relevance of the proposed CBR programme, plans for community ownership and sustainability, and extent of initiatives undertaken for CBR till date. |
Follow up |
|
Remarks | This was a community development project with little idea about disability issues and planning for disability programmes. However, they were motivated to carry out programmes for the identified disabled persons in their target area. Distribution of background materials on disability and CBR prior to the visit, and carrying out of a customised training session on CBR planning helped the project to crystallise its ideas further, and they were able to successfully plan for a feasibility study prior to initiating a CBR programme in their area. |
Organisational diagnosis and development assignments - Discussion
Among the organisational diagnosis and development assignments undertaken, four dealt with reviewing the functioning of the organisation and suggesting ways of improving the administrative systems, two assignments were appraisals to assess the suitability of the organisations to take up CBR programmes, one was to train the organisation in planning and skills development for a specific purpose, i.e., fund-raising with an optimum mix of resources, and one was to develop the policy document for an organisation. Six of the assignments were initiated by donor organisations while the remaining two were initiated by implementing NGOs. Some factors that the authors identified as critical ones for successful outcomes in these assignments are briefly described in this section.
Firstly, it is necessary to have sufficient preparation time prior to the field intervention, in order to obtain background information about the assignment, to clarify objectives and to develop a suitable methodology that is acceptable and affordable to the client organisations. The needs and expectations of all concerned parties with regard to the assignment require to clarified, and the interventions need to be tailored to suit the clients' requirements. By taking this step earlier, the confusion that sometimes arises during field visits or during training sessions, can be avoided and the real time spent at the site reduced, thereby reducing the costs of assignments and at the same time arriving at the most valid results.
Systematic planning, evaluation and monitoring are still not well understood by many NGOs in developing countries. Many activities are carried out in a random manner without being linked to the goals of the organisation. While most organisations are able to articulate their vision and mission statements quite clearly, they require assistance in activity planning, target setting, identification of outcome indicators and methods of measurement. Often a listing of activities and their quantitative measures are confused with outcome indicators and impact, giving rise to a false sense of accomplishment.
Evaluation assignments tended to be limit setting exercises earlier, where the evaluators had to identify whether the organisations had transgressed pre-set boundaries of their programmes, and guide them back to their original positions wherever necessary. Today however, evaluations that are promotive in nature are usually required by the clients, involving organisational diagnosis and development exercises dealing with aspects like programme planning and forecasting, attitude changes, improving management systems, promoting sustainability, replication of successful service provision methods, and so on.. Thus these assignments are more comprehensive and more goal oriented.
3. Training assignments - Description
Assignments 'A' and 'B'
Objectives |
|
Participants | 30 participants each from project partners of the donor, at two workshops conducted in different regions. |
Duration | 2 days each |
Design | Field visit and workshop, with participatory group discussions. |
Outcome | The participants gained an overview of CBR concepts, practices in the field, and the elements of systematic planning of activities, target setting, identification of outcome indicators and methods to measure them. |
Remarks | The distribution of preparatory background materials about CBR and about planning, and the participatory method of learning helped the participants to gain a better knowledge about CBR and about the planning process. However, two days was considered as insufficient for both a field visit and for the training session because for most NGOs who had been working in unrelated areas earlier, the time was too short learn about CBR concepts and practice. Secondly, most NGOs who attended these workshops were used to only random planning for their programmes, without clear goal oriented activities, and this mind set had to be changed before training them in systematic planning. |
Assignment 'C'
Objectives |
|
Perticipants | 30 participants from industry representing one half of the country. |
Duration | 1 day |
Design | Presentations from some of the participants about their community welfare programmes, followed by a workshop to brainstorm and come up with suggestions on how industry can effectively participate in development work. |
Outcome | Further workshops were planned by the organisers, to assist industry to plan and implement community development programmes, either on their own, or in partnership with government and international donors, and to assess the cost effectiveness of the programmes undertaken. |
Remarks | Since community development is still a peripheral activity for most of Indian industry, they do not have much enthusiasm to be involved in development work. As a result, they tend to identify highly visible, but short term projects with poor results, as the most desirable ones for their participation. Attitude change in Indian industry is necessary for them to be involved in sustainable development programmes. |
Assignment 'D'
Objectives |
|
Perticipants | 35 participants from the field of leprosy treatment and rehabilitation from different countries in the South Asian region. |
Duration | 3 days. |
Design | Workshop, with small group discussions and participatory learning methods. |
Outcome |
|
Remarks | Clarifying the requirements of the trainees well in advance, distribution of background materials much before the workshop and the participatory method of learning helped the trainees to evolve strategies to apply the knowledge gained from the workshop, to their work in leprosy rehabilitation. |
Assignment 'E'
Objectives |
|
Perticipants | 12 participants, from CBR projects from different parts of Africa, supported by the donor. |
Duration | 5 days. |
Design | Workshop, with participatory learning methods. |
Outcome |
|
Remarks | Planning for the workshop well in advance, clarifying the objectives, the distribution of background materials earlier and the participatory method of learning contributed to the effectiveness of the workshop. |
Assignment 'F'
Objectives |
|
Perticipants | 20 participants from CBR projects supported by the donor in India and Bangladesh |
Duration | 4 days |
Design | Workshop, with participatory learning and discussion, presentations on topics of early intervention and physiotherapy, followed by participatory workshop and discussions. |
Outcome |
|
Remarks | Planning for the workshop well in advance, clarifying the objectives, the distribution of background materials earlier and the participatory method of learning contributed to the effectiveness of the workshop. |
Assignment 'G'
Objectives |
|
Perticipants | 13 participants from CBR projects from one state in India, supported by the donor. |
Duration | 2 days |
Design | Workshop, with participatory learning and discussions |
Outcome |
|
Remarks | Most of the trainees reported that they had gained new knowledge from the workshop. Advance planning, clarifying the background and the requirements of the trainees, and the distribution of background materials much before the workshop helped the trainees to acquire the knowledge effectively. |
Assignment 'H'
Objectives |
|
Perticipants | 40 participants, from rehabilitation projects from different parts of the world. |
Duration | 2 hours |
Design | Workshop, with participatory learning and discussions |
Outcome | The participants gained an overview of the different factors influencing sustainability in relation to CBR. They reported that they were able to discuss different issues related to sustainability, to become aware of how these factors differed in different parts of the world, and how these factors are dealt with by different groups. |
Remarks | Remarks The handouts prepared as background material facilitated the process of effective learning. The level of satisfaction with the workshop was high, because the participants found that they benefited greatly from the cross cultural learning of how different the problems were in different parts of the world, and how they had something to learn from each of the strategies used in different places, at the same time realising that many things were not applicable in other contexts. |
Assignment 'I'
Objectives |
|
Perticipants | 20 participants from CBR projects from different provinces in China. |
Duration | One and a half days |
Design | Workshop, with participatory learning and discussions |
Outcome |
|
Remarks | The prior distribution of preparatory materials for discussion, translation of those materials into the local language, and the participatory method of learning helped to make the discussions more focused and useful for the trainees. The level of satisfaction with the workshop was high, because of the participatory methods used that were new to this group, and that were seen as a welcome change from the didactic methods that they were used to earlier. |
Training assignments - Discussion
Among the training assignments, eight dealt with the need for improving knowledge on CBR concepts and planning, while one dealt with helping industry to plan for its role in community development. The individual needs and requirements of the assignments were varied in relation to their duration, expected outcomes, number of participants, and costs. Because of this reason, standardised training programme are not likely to be effective learning exercises for these kinds of assorted groups. Each training programme had to be flexible and carefully planned in advance and customised to fulfil the specific requirements of each group. Preparation of precise background materials related to the themes of the workshop and their distribution well in advance to the trainees helped to focus the discussion and resulted in better outcome. The participatory methods used in the workshops helped the trainees to construct strategies realistically, using examples from their own experiences.
CONCLUSION
The goal of the Technical Support Group is to improve efficiency in development organisations, using the available current knowledge effectively. Traditionally, organisations provide information on different themes through publications and the establishment of resource centres such as that of Healthlink in London. These organisations facilitate the quick retrieval of available information for those who wish to do so. However, there are few seekers of information in a non-competitive field like development where most funds are charity based and most activities are non-profit oriented welfare programmes. The motivation to improve efficiency and to become more accountable, is generally low in such fields. The Technical Support Group has been experimenting with different strategies to overcome this form of resistance to change in development organisations through information generation and dissemination, organisational diagnosis and development, and training. All these activities attempt to change the mind-set of a critical mass of people in the field of rehabilitation, and thus increase efficiency and accountability through peer pressure. The expectation is that under the influence of a critical mass with changed attitudes, a new trend will be initiated through peer pressure, which will be followed by others as well. The area for change that is identified by the authors as the most critical in this field, is goal oriented planning. Poor access to available information also limits the pace of change in this area. Because of these reasons, most of the technical support provided by the group is primarily to promote better access to information, to make an early diagnosis of malfunctioning, and to carry out training to imbibe newer methods. It is too early however, to conclude if these strategies will lead to significant changes in the development field in the near future.
Tel and fax : 91-80-6633762, Email : thomasmaya@hotmail.com
REFERENCE
- Thomas MJ, Thomas M. Need for Technical Support in Rehabilitation in Developing Countries. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal 1997; 8 (2): 37-39.
Title:
ASIA PACIFIC DISABILITY REHABILITATION JOURNAL Vol. 10 @ No. 1 @ 2000
Produced by:
Shree Ramana Maharishi Academy for the Blind, 3rd Cross, 3rd Phase, J.P. Nagar, Bangalore - 560 078, India.
Tel : 91-80-6631076, Fax : 91-80-6638045
Printed at:
National Printing Press, 580, K.R. Garden, Koramangala, Bangalore - 560 095, India. Tel : 91-80-5710658